Services nearby

If a site has houses beside it and pipes running past it, surely connecting another house should be straightforward?

It is an understandable assumption. It is also one worth checking before agreeing a price.

On 20 October 2026, Longford County Council refused permission for 30 proposed homes at Silver Birches, Dunbeggan, Stonepark. Its weekly planning report, dated 28 October, records the decision under reference 26/60078. The proposal comprised 24 three-bedroom semi-detached houses and six two-bedroom terraced houses, with connections proposed to the estate’s existing service networks (Longford County Council, 2026).

Reporting on 28 October, the *Longford Leader* highlighted concerns about wastewater capacity (Quinn, 2026). The council’s weekly list confirms the refusal, but does not set out its detailed reasons. This is a council-stage decision, not evidence that every neighbouring site has the same problem or that the proposal’s future is settled.

It does, however, prompt a question with relevance well beyond Stonepark: what do we actually mean when we say land is serviced?

A green marker is a starting point

Uisce Éireann publishes wastewater treatment capacity registers. They are useful, provided we read the qualifications as carefully as the colours.

The Longford register, published in April 2026 and checked for this article on 1 November, marks Longford and Newtownforbes green, indicating spare treatment capacity. It expressly warns that the register does not confirm capacity for an individual development and does not assess the capacity of the sewer network (Uisce Éireann, 2026b).

There is no contradiction between that general indication and a difficulty affecting a particular proposal. The treatment plant is only part of the journey. The relevant pipes, connection point and infrastructure serving the site also matter.

Nor does a Longford town entry establish what serves an estate at Stonepark. The precise system and its ownership need to be identified, rather than inferred from the nearest town name.

What the neighbouring counties show

The April 2026 Roscommon register lists Strokestown as green. Across the county boundary, the Leitrim register lists Carrick-on-Shannon and Dromod as green, while Mohill is amber. Amber indicates potential spare capacity requiring further assessment of the particular load; it is not a blanket prohibition on building (Uisce Éireann, 2026a; 2026c).

Those entries help explain why a county-wide slogan about “no capacity” can be misleading. Equally, a favourable entry cannot answer whether a particular plot can connect on acceptable terms.

These are indicative registers, not reservations of capacity. They should not be read as a promise about a home, a development timetable or a town’s future house prices.

For someone buying land around Strokestown or considering a small scheme in Dromod, the useful next step is therefore a site-specific enquiry, not an assumption based on the colour beside the settlement.

Three documents that answer different questions

Planning permission addresses the proposed development through the planning process. It does not guarantee a water or wastewater connection.

A Confirmation of Feasibility is another distinct step. Uisce Éireann’s guidance says it is neither a guarantee of planning permission nor a commitment to provide a connection. A connection application and the required acceptance steps remain necessary (Uisce Éireann, n.d.-a).

That distinction can get lost in a conversation about a site. “There is planning” and “the water is sorted” sound reassuring. The sensible response is to ask which documents support each statement and precisely what they cover.

There is a further distinction where private infrastructure is involved: Uisce Éireann says it only issues Confirmation of Feasibility for connections to its own network. An enquiry about a public connection cannot resolve every question about a privately operated system (Uisce Éireann, n.d.-a).

Ask early enough for the answer to matter

Uisce Éireann recommends making a Pre-Connection Enquiry before finalising a development’s design and seeking planning permission. Its guidance currently gives an average of 16 weeks from enquiry to Confirmation of Feasibility. That is an average, not a guaranteed deadline (Uisce Éireann, n.d.-b).

The practical implication is straightforward: leave this until the end, and an important design or budget assumption may still be unresolved when other commitments have already been made.

Before committing to a purchase or substantial design expenditure, assemble a short, specific brief:

  • Identify the exact site and proposed use, including the number of homes.
  • Establish who owns and operates the relevant infrastructure.
  • Obtain the available connection correspondence and check its date, scope and conditions.
  • Ask the engineer what works, permissions or third-party rights may be needed, and what remains uncosted.
  • Ask the solicitor how unresolved matters should be addressed in the proposed transaction.

These are due-diligence questions, not a finding that any particular site has a defect.

Why this belongs in the price discussion

My view is that a site’s potential becomes more meaningful as the route to delivery becomes clearer.

A buyer assessing land with an unresolved infrastructure question is considering more than a possible bill. There may also be uncertainty about timing, design and the scale of development that can proceed. Those uncertainties belong in the appraisal rather than in an optimistic footnote.

That does not support a standard percentage reduction in value. There is no verified local evidence here for such a figure. The effect depends on the property, the proposed scheme, the actual solution and the market evidence.

For a seller, assembling the documents can make the proposition easier to understand. For a buyer, asking for them can prevent a nearby pipe from becoming an expensive assumption.

The useful question is not simply whether services are close. It is whether the proposed connection has been investigated, on what terms, and what still needs to happen.

References

Download this article’s reference list ↓

Longford County Council (2026) Weekly planning lists, 19–25 October 2026, report dated 28 October, ‘Planning applications refused’, p. 11 of the combined PDF, reference 26/60078. Available at: Weekly planning lists, 19–25 October 2026, report dated 28 October, ‘Planning applications refused’, p. 11 of the combined PDF, reference 26/60078 (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

Quinn, T. (2026) ‘Council refuse planning permission for 30 Longford homes after local concerns raised’, Longford Leader, 28 October, published 18:30 GMT, updated 22:14 GMT. Available at: ‘Council refuse planning permission for 30 Longford homes after local concerns raised’, Longford Leader, 28 October, published 18:30 GMT, updated 22:14 GMT (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

Uisce Éireann (2026a) Leitrim wastewater treatment capacity register, April. Available at: Leitrim wastewater treatment capacity register, April (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

Uisce Éireann (2026b) Longford wastewater treatment capacity register, April. Available at: Longford wastewater treatment capacity register, April (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

Uisce Éireann (2026c) Roscommon wastewater treatment capacity register, April. Available at: Roscommon wastewater treatment capacity register, April (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

Uisce Éireann (n.d.-a) Connections FAQs. Available at: Connections FAQs (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

Uisce Éireann (n.d.-b) Pre-Connection Enquiry Phase. Available at: Pre-Connection Enquiry Phase (Accessed: 1 November 2026).

General information for Irish property matters. The requirements of a particular instruction should be discussed with the appropriate professional. Editorial approach and source policy.

The wider picture

Follow a guided reading route around this question.

Keep exploring

Explore valuation purposes Return to the library